Mry Cty > Supervisor Glenn Church
Mry Cty > Supervisor Glenn Church
Embedded Files
Media Alert
2/18/2026
This web page has been created for the Adjudicated Media of Monterey County CA, their Media Owners, and the Pajaroan (paper just across the Monterey County/Santa Cruz County line that serves Church's neighbors) (full media list at bottom of page). TIP - Check out the rest of the website as well after this has been read...
Adjudicated Papers
Monterey County Weekly
Carmel Pine Cone
Monterey County Herald
Register-Pajaronian** (not mc adjudicated)
El Sol (tri-county)
The Californian (Salinas)
The Rustler (King City)
Cedar Street Times
Owners
Milestone Communications
Independent (Paul Miller, owner/publisher)
Gannett Co. Inc.
New SV Media Inc.
Gannett Co. Inc.
Gannett Co. Inc.
New SV Media Inc.
Independent (Marge Ann Jameson)
Notice of Bifurcated SEI 700 filing by Monterey County District 2 Supervisor Glenn Church in 2024 and 2025 which exposed the concealment of 1) Wife Kathryn McKenzie's work as Editor with largest local print Media in Monterey County (Monterey Herald) 2) Church's participation in numerous Multi-County Boards not disclosed to the County 3) 12M+ in Commercial real estate and partnerships with Real Estate Brokers inside of non-disclosed LLCs (and much more).
NOTE -- And nobody reviewing any of the SEI 700 Documents who noted the bifurcation, perjury and fraud -- would have any clue the Church family owned 3000 acres of land in the 1870s, the Vierra Family owned 1000 acres of land in the 1870s, McKenzie (Church's wife) is a Media Darling with family wealth and multi-decade Parternships in non-disclosed LLCs with the Commercial Brokerage industry -- and that Church's extended family -- also beneficiaries of that original 3000 acres, now control 40,000 acres of farmland in Mry Cty (600-800B in revenues, vertically integrated -- ops in CA, AZ and Mexico)
Church, with Vierra in tow, represented himself as "regular people" during his campaign in a misleading way without proper Media oversight (which his wife Kathryn McKenzie was heavily engaged in), making the entire election process fraudulent -- and 3 years of legislating has been fraudulent both because of that and because of what he actually then did in legislative actions.
The easiest way to expose Church, get him removed from office, and initiate the reversal of three years of unlawful behavior is to focus exclusively on the "bifurcated e-filing scheme" he engaged in in 2024 and 2025. It should expose enough to create the leverage needed for removal. If not, there are hundreds of other facts and pages that can be presented.
Church is an amoral, unethical man, who will never tell the entire truth to anyone, as evident via analysis of years of SEI 700 filings -- who filed SEI 700 documents under penalty of perjury in 2024 and 2025 that hid material facts from the county, the state and anyone who tried to oversee him or his activities.
Church and the board of supervisors were presented with these facts in late January 2026 -- ( but without this level of resolution ) and Church was asked to resign. Church has not resigned and the Monterey County Board of Supervisors has not expelled him as is required once aware of fraudulent activity.
"Bifurcated Filing" Explained
"Bifurcated Filing" Explained
"Bifurcated filing" is a phrase i created to describe Church's behavior in 2024 and 2025. It refers to the act of providing different SEI 700 data sets to the county and to the state that should have been identical --- and the differences exposed by comparing documents show a desire to hide facts from the county and any county constituent or media person who may have thought only to check county documents -- presuming the state filing was the same. NOTE: the incomplete nature of the county documents would not have been accepted by the state -- and they should not have been accepted by the County Clerk, Marina Camacho -- and that's where there is a lot more fraud and conspiracy concerns to be exposed.
This bifurcated filing process should never have been made available to Church, 289 other County Supervisors (58x5) or ??? other people who have county and state filing requirements for county work.
The FPPC and all County Clerks (58) allowed the Creation of improper business process that lost document control
Prior to efiling, the SEI 700 filing process revolved around the presentation of paper documents to the County Clerk - the county clerk would review for completeness, and accept and stamp if acceptable. For those she received that were also due to the tate per Statute, for oversite, she/he would then forward a copy to the state (the FPPC) via mail or email. Upon receipt, presumably they would actually review to double check the county clerk (in theory but that isn't happening).
When e-filing was implemented it seems the FPPC, 58 county clerks and their software vendors decided to just "skip" all rational chain of data and document controls used to manage Republics for 1000's of years. Accident or Intentional? What could go wrong, right?
Example of "proper process" - Church's 2023 paper filings
An example of paper filing process is shown below in 2023 when Church physically presented his documents to the County Clerk (and then filed ammendments to those).
Church presented documents to the county Clerk, they were stamped, but they were patently incomplete.
Church then ammended those.
Church's original filing and his ammended statement were then e sent on to the FPPC (buy maile or scanned copy via email) where they were stamped there. (as evidenced by both county and FPPC stamps on the state document)
NOTE: functionally this represents proper process with the exception that the county clerk seemed not to review his original submssion or his ammendment for basic document completion requirements (mismatched page count to pages, missing pages, missing schedules, missing page count, missing data in key fields, etc). The document stampes shows what proper process looked like (stampted by county and then stamped by state). the rest is bad form.
Example of "bifurcated process" - Church's 2024 and 2025
In 2024 and 2025 Church chose to e-file his data. In 2024, the data he filed on 3/7/2024 is very different than that he filed with the state on 3/22/2024. In 2025, the data he filed with the County and State on 3/2/2025, just 45 minutes apart is very different from each other and some of it is not continuous with the filings the year prior.
These are not mistakes. They are the work of an inversionist -- someoone who confuses facts for sole purpose of confusion and the benefits that brings -- which is privacy and a shield from oversight due to too mcuh complexity. An example of 10 lies being better than 1 for concealment of identity is below.
"Bifurcated Filing" - Verify documents for yourself
"Bifurcated Filing" - Verify documents for yourself
This table below Contains live links...
Filing Year 2023 | 2024 | 2025
Filed w/ With County Clerk 20230202c 20230202ca(20230316) | 20240307c ??? | 20250302c ???
Filed w/ State (FPPC) - 20230202s 20230202sa(20230316) | ???? 20240322s | 20250302s 20250302sa(20250327)
State Filing Index 1 2 ??? 3 4 5
Analysis - gDoc (60 pages)
Other
20170309 - Assuming Office - Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency - Alt. Board Member
20171012 - Leaving Office - Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency - Alt. Director
20230303(20230509) - Assuming Office - Monterey One Water (Ammendeded)
2024 Audit - Click on 20240307c and note the red stamp in the upper right corner. Click on 20240322s and note the Black FPPC stamp in the upper right corner but no red stamp or markings from county. Different documents and as it turns out dramatically different data sets. Compare the two documents you will see the differences in Disclosures to State vs County. You will see he's vague on everything with the county in ways they should not have accepted.
This 2024 and 2024 audit at a simple level exposes 4 acts of perjury. Two bad filings with the County and two bad filings with the state (because he omitted things to the state he did expose to the county that were material too.
This overt level of purjery and fraud, comparable to a child gettig caught red-handed stealing money from mom's purse or dad's wallet can not be allowed to pass. Church is behaving in lawless manner with these filings AND that can in fact be seen in his county behavior as well -- this just makes it black and white.
Church needs to resign immediately and/or injunctions need to be executed immediately ceasing all board activities.
"Bifurcated Filing" - Visuals
"Bifurcated Filing" - Visuals
For those who can't read or click on links...
There are other concerns as well, but these are the big ones...
Monterey County Adjudicated Media
Monterey County Adjudicated Media
The media outlets below are at fault for this. They have a short window of time to make it right.
Page updated
Report abuse