Bar Complaint > Atty Ashlee Gustafson
Bar Complaint > Atty Ashlee Gustafson
Embedded Files
Ashlee Gustafson was hired to represent a General Contractor who engaged in concealment work as part of a home sale.
As part of her representation for the General Contractor, we feel Ashlee engaged in at least 6 acts of fraud, misconduct, and/or incompetence.
The fraudulent acts were intended to create FUD for purposes of oppressing our rights in a malicious manner,
Many people do NOT realize Attorneys are sworn in as "Officers of the Court". They were not meant to be "business people" who lied, cheated and stole to earn a schilling. Our research indicates some very foul things transpired in the California legal industry in the early to mid 1970s and it became very corrupt. Gustafson's behavior seems to support that theory.
The following are 6 acts of Fraud, Mis-conduct, and/or incompetence by Gustafson
The following are 6 acts of Fraud, Mis-conduct, and/or incompetence by Gustafson
General Denial for Unlimited Verified Complaint - Gustafson answered the lawsuit with a General Denial. The complaint was a verified unlimited complaint. It required a verified response but Gustafson ignored that.
The General Denial Document included 24 possible defenses, and over 10 of those were tied to a suggestion her client had a defense via the Real Estate Contract in use. Such defense has been tied to Legal Lobby Racketeering scheme related to CAR Contract Manipulation which has been presented to the CA Bar multiple times prior now. (ie - it appears Gustafson was attempting to use a templated defense document created for racketeering scheme protection)
Attorney Fees - Gustafson's Prayer/Demand included a request for Attorney Fees. This is a case for fraud and fraud only. Gusafton appears to have no legal basis for that suggestion, which gives rise to the use of FUD for coercive purposes.
Cross Defendants for non-existent complaint - The General Denial included a Prayer that references a “Cross Defendant” which is non-existent in this situation.
Defendant Mis statements - Gustafson issued a Request for Production of Documents with an additional Defendant and Does named that were not part of our Complaint.
Excessive requests - A Request for Interrogatories (General and Construction related) including "META DATA" which we found to be excessive and inappropriate given the claims were for Torts without privity of contract related to Concealment of Structural defects, mold, cat urine, rodent urine and other moisture related matters of her client. These were and are not subject to any contracts other than those he might have done work for on the property.
Page updated
Report abuse